Surely there is
No story of more woe
Than that of Wade and Roe...
Does no one else find it strange that the very same states fiercely defending their right to bear arms strip women of their right to decide whether or not to bear children?
The same constitution that enshrines the right to arms also (according to the Justices of the Supreme Court) does not guarantee privacy or sovereignty over our own bodies.
The same Justice eagerly looks forward to stripping away the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and even same-sex love...
The Supreme Court believes there are no circumstances under which abortion is permissible: Not rape, the mother's survival, or the extreme deformity of the child which would lead to life-long suffering.
What next? No contraception, going to jail for the love that dare not speak its name?
Shouldn't the Supreme Court be much more concerned with protecting the children of their Nation who are hungry, homeless, and abused?
Just asking...
MC
No comments:
Post a Comment